Sqlite order by syntax8/17/2023 ![]() ![]() ![]() Without the ordering it can probably just return after fetching the first 50 rows while the ordering has to repartition all data in order to complete the query. SQLite ORDER BY clause is used to sort the data in an ascending or descending order, based on one or more columns. The execution time might not be affected by the ordering at all but instead by the repartition. Without the ordering part the repartition only takes ~5 ms. IndexRangeScan laravel.site_keyword, PRIMARY KEY (site_id, keyword_id) scan: est_table_rows:7,790,339 est_filtered:346,316įrom another look at the profile it seems like the repartition (~120 ms) is the bottleneck when ordering with the joined table. Repartition AS r0 shard_key: est_rows:346,315 TableScan r0 storage:list stream:yes est_table_rows:346,315 This way, youll sort the data in ascending order by this column. GatherMerge partitions:all est_rows:50 alias:remote_0 Use the ORDER BY keyword and the name of the column by which you want to sort. Unfortunately, it seems to slow it down a bit further.Īpparently, it sorts in the end of the execution: Top offset:0 limit:50 75 ms (Visual Explain says 2 thanks for your suggestion. The index works great without the JOIN clause with an incredible speed of approx. The ORDER BY clause, as you can imagine, lets us specify the sorting. 35M rows while the site_keyword for this particular query contains approx. For this lesson, download the following file, which is a SQLite database built. is compatible with most database systems, including MySQL, MariaDB, PostgreSQL, and SQLite. We tried with an index like alter table keywords add index (volume desc, id) but without any notable improvement.Ĭan anything be done to improve the first query? The keywords table contains approx. How to specify the order, retrieved attributes, grouping. If the ORDER BY clause is skipped the query executes in approx. In MemSQL Studio the above query executes in approx. Inner join site_keyword on keywords.id = site_keyword.keyword_id and site_keyword.site_id = 1 This is probably better explained with an example: select ![]() Is it possible to optimize a query with both JOINs and ORDER BY as long as the ORDER BY clause only targets columns from the first table? ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |